Friday, April 25, 2014

The other day I was listening to FM channel 92.7 and the RJ was telling the listeners about the superstitious practices that the movie stars owning IPL teams follow to make sure that their teams win. If she is to be believed, Kings XI Punjab owner Preity Zinta goes to a temple early in the morning on the day of the match to pray for her team's success and on her return distributes the Prasaad to the team. Juhi Chawla and Shahrukh Khan, the owners of Kolkata Knight Riders, make sure they wear a particular jersey while watching KKR play. Rajasthan Royals' Shilpa Shetty wears two watches on the same wrist while watching her team play.

And then there is Amitabh Bachchan. He doesn't own any team but is a fan of Mumbai Indians. Apparently, he never watches any of MI matches live, only the recordings. Going by the poor performance of the team so far in this season, it looks like Mr. Bachchan would do well to stop watching the recordings as well.

Supernatural S9 - Meta Fiction

The Season Finale is just a few episodes down the line and I already seem to be losing the plot! Is Metatron good or evil? Why doesn't he want the angels to return to Heaven? Castiel is shown accepting the leadership of the angels towards the end of the episode. Does that mean that he has accepted Metatron's proposal? Or is he merely playing the scribe? Is Gabriel really dead (can an angel die?)?

And the most important question: Has Metatron hatched this whole plan by himself or is there a grand divine design behind all this?

The Reluctant Fundamentalist - Mohsin Hamid (Spoiler Alert!)

The title and the storyline on the back cover gave me a pretty good idea of what the novel must be about. But the words 'Shortlisted For Man Booker Prize 2007' caught my attention.

This is the story of Changez - a Pakistani boy, who goes to the US for higher studies and gets a job in a well-known firm in New York city after completion of the course. He also falls in love with a white girl, Erica. Just when he thinks that things cannot get any better, 9/11 happens. Almost overnight America's perception of the people of his faith changes. As he tries to come to grips with it, America invades Afghanistan. And that changes Changez in ways that he previously would have thought to be impossible.

If you ask me whether I liked the novel, I would be hard pressed for an answer. There isn't anything in it which couldn't have been guessed, at least by any Indian - Muslim or otherwise. I find the author's views rather biased. Of course, most of us are like that. But if he were to spare a moment stepping into the shoes of people of other faiths, he would not be able to hold them responsible for secular Muslims' switch to fundamentalism, at least not completely. For those who are either not religious or consider religion as only part of their identity, it is very difficult to understand those whose religion is a major part of their identity. To be sure, I am as unsettled by an ordinary person who walks about in office or public places with a vermillion streak across his forehead (the so-called mark of a 'devout' Hindu!) as I am by people bringing prayer mats to office. As far as I am concerned, my relation with my God is a private thing and completely different from my public persona. When the two are mixed there is bound to be some uneasiness, some uncertainty. That's because others can't figure out where your first loyalty lies - to your country or to your religion. e.g. in the novel, Changez is angry when America invades Afghanistan, because that is a fellow Muslim country. This religion-based fellowship is something that others, especially Hindus, might find hard to stomach - maybe because there is no Hindu country in the world. Naturally, whenever there is a cross-border act of terrorism, any non-Muslim Indian, at some point, however flittingly, is bound to wonder if the Indian Muslims sympathize with our neighbor because of the religious affinity.

Of course, it does not mean that all Muslims should be viewed with suspicion. During my stay in India I have had Muslim friends who have been very open about celebrating other faiths - not because they had to, but because they liked to. And I am sure that majority of Muslims are like that. But unfortunately, those few who aren't are more vocal than those who are. The moderate Muslims don't speak up and so can't be heard, thus playing right into the hands of those who want to foment communal tension and spread the belief that 'they are like that only'. After all, there is no way to distinguish between those who are secular and those who aren't - this applies to Hindus and Muslims both. 

There is one more angle to it. If you don't want to be treated differently, then you have to make an effort to blend in. There are no two ways about it. If a community abides by a set of laws that are different than the laws set by the country's constitution, then it is setting itself apart from the rest of the country by that very process. Sad but true. A news item on the international page of Mint a few days back read as follows - Philippines president Benigno Aquino formally received a draft law for the creation of an autonomous area for the country's Muslim minority. Need I say more?

Coming back to the novel, I also wonder why the story in a nutshell at the back of the book mentions that Changez is betrayed by the Western country and Western woman that he loved. Erica does not reject Changez because he is a Muslim. She rejects him because she cannot forget her first love, though he is long dead. If Erica didn't have any psychological issues, Changez would have ended up betraying her because his Pakistani family wouldn't have accepted a Firang Bahu of different faith in their fold - irrespective if whether 9/11 had happened or not. So, I think the novel would have done fine without Erica.

As I read this book, I painfully realized that in this day and age, many events have the potential to turn each one of us -  no matter what our faith - into a reluctant fundamentalist.

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

The hammer shatters glass but forges steel. What trouble does to you depends on what is in you.

- Old Russian Proverb

Asia 7, Palladium Mall, Lower Parel

Asia 7 has a new chef. Hence a new menu. We were slightly disappointed because we had ended up there in anticipation of having meal-in-a-bowl for lunch. I said "slightly" because the revamped menu looks good. Of course, any time you order something which you have not already tasted at that restaurant there is a chance, however slim, that the dish might not be to your liking. But it is equally true that it would have been a waste of money to order run-of-the-mill stuff like Fried rice or Satay or Phad Thai for that matter. So I decided to trust the smiling confident demeanor of the new chef on the first page of the menu and ordered Nasi Goreng along with Five spiced shredded chicken & wood ear mushroom.

First things first. Since my experience at Bade Miya a couple of weeks ago I have been rather doubtful about the portion size of the dishes served at the restaurants. From my earlier visits to Asia 7 I knew that it never disappointed on this front. Still, the new chef could have made some changes. Turned out that my worries were totally unfounded. When the waiter brought our lunch, I was pleased to see that the portions were in line with the servings at other establishments. :-)

Nasi Goreng & Five Spice Shredded Chicken
Anytime I order a meat dish, I am worried that the meat might not be cooked thoroughly (it had happened at Bade Miya). But as far as the Five Spiced dish goes, both the chicken and the mushrooms were cooked just right. There was lots of tasty gravy. Though it wasn't salty by any means I wonder if the chef could have done with a bit of less salt.

Nasi Goreng is the national dish of Indonesia. I have wanted to taste it since a very long time and I am glad to say that I wasn't disappointed. It consisted of fried rice, slightly sweet, tossed with chicken pieces in what the menu said was 'sambal and shrimp paste'. It was garnished with 2 chicken satay pieces and a sunny-side-up egg. Though the menu mentioned the dish having prawns, I didn't find any. But since I am not a big fan of seafood anyways, I didn't mind. :-)

So, in case you haven't been to Asia 7 since their menu changed, I recommend that you pay them a visit at the earliest opportunity you can get. You will end up grinning ear-to-ear like the chef. :-)
Just 2 days to go for the voting in Mumbai and I am still debating who to vote for. Finally, I decided to jot down the negative points of both the parties - the Congress and the BJP, at least as far as my meager knowledge and awareness would allow me to. The side with less negative points would get my vote. In case you are wondering, I don't think much of either the weak 3rd front or the Delhi-fiasco called AAP.

The incumbent government first:

- Despite two consecutive terms at the center, there isn't much to show on the economic front. They don't seem to have any concrete plan for tackling unemployment and inflation.
- No tough stance against the Pakistan imported terrorism. The naxals are having a field day. The armed forces are saddled with obsolete weapons.
- Crony capitalism. I admit though that if BJP were to come to power, it wouldn't be much different.
- The party needs to be shaken out of their belief that the top job is theirs for the asking. 5 years of sitting in opposition would certainly do them mighty good.
- My biggest bug-bear is that the country is being ruled by a foreigner aka Sonia Gandhi. Yeah, yeah, she wears a saree and all that. But being married to an Indian and living here for years doesn't make her an Indian. Wait, I am under no illusion that a PM who is an Indian by ethnicity will strive for the country's betterment. Yet, for me it is simply unpalatable that the government is being run by a foreigner by proxy.

Now it's the turn of the BJP:

- Godhra. And by that I don't only mean the killing of the Muslims. Hindu pilgrims were killed as well, though hardly anyone seems to talk about it. People from both communities died on Modi's watch.
- Was Gujarat really transformed under Modi's rule or not? There seems to be no way to find out for sure for a common person like me. Even if there was progress, can Modi repeat the performance at the national level? Would he?
- The perceived threat of dictatorship. Sometimes I wonder if people in the world's largest democracy deserve democracy or not. Much as I would like to believe that a few years under a dictator would straighten every Indian out, I cannot make myself wish it upon my country. However broken, democracy is good.
- the fact that Modi has almost abandoned the woman he was married to when they were very young. If he didn't consider a child-marriage as a legal marriage, why didn't he persuade her to get married and get on with her life? Much as we would like to believe that the public life of a leader is separate from his personal one, they are really two sides of the same coin, isn't it? You choose one, you get the other too.
- Why do I cringe every time the ad 'हम मोदीजीको लानेवाले है, अच्छे दिन आनेवाले है' is played on the FM channels? Why can't I believe the man when he says that he will do this and do that?

You with me so far? If you are, then you can see that this is really a choice between the devil and the deep sea i.e. no choice at all. My sense of decency won't allow me to flip a coin and be done with it. NOTA sounds rather like sitting on the fence. God knows the economy wants a decisive win with clear majority. Yet casting my lot with either the BJP or the Congress feels like I am not doing enough as the citizen of this country.

Increasingly, I am dreading waking up on 24th morning. :-(